Wired's Gaming Chair Test: Branch Ergonomic Pro Emerges as Top Pick Over Style-First Competitors
A Wired reviewer tested multiple gaming chairs and found that prioritizing comfort and adjustability over gaming aesthetics yielded the best results for extended use.
What happened
Wired's product reviewer tested three gaming chairs: the Branch Ergonomic Chair Pro (including Sega-branded versions), the Razer Iskur V2 Newgen, and the Herman Miller Embody. The Branch chair was selected as the top recommendation, praised for comfort, adjustability, value for money, and availability in multiple Sega-branded designs with different back materials. The Razer Iskur V2 was rated second, noted for adaptive lumbar support and recline quality but flagged for heat retention during long sessions. The Embody, an expensive option, was still being evaluated after an initial week of testing revealed stiffness and creaking, though the reviewer plans to continue testing pending a break-in period. Testing methodology involved 8+ hours daily of chair use, including gaming sessions (Path of Exile 2, League of Legends, Stardew Valley), work use, and full feature adjustment.
Context
The review reflects a broader concern about gaming chairs—that manufacturers often prioritize gamer aesthetics and brand gimmicks over genuine comfort and ergonomic design. The testing revealed that a chair designed as an office chair can outperform purpose-built gaming chairs for users who spend extended periods seated. Key factors for comfort across use cases included adjustable lumbar support, seat height and depth, armrests, recline function, breathability, and build quality. The significance lies in guiding consumers toward prioritizing ergonomic features over marketing claims, particularly for anyone using a chair for both work and leisure over many hours daily.