Pentagon's UAP Office Releases Delayed Annual Report, Documents 319 New Cases with All Resolved to Conventional Causes
The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office released its FY2025 report months behind schedule, showing a sharp decline in submissions but continued focus on incidents near sensitive facilities.

What happened
The Department of Defense's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) released its FY2025 Consolidated Annual Report on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena in July 2026, several months after the statutory deadline required by Congress (180 days after December 23, 2022, and annually thereafter). The report documents 319 newly received UAP reports covering incidents from June 2, 2024, through May 30, 2025. According to AARO, it received 319 UAP reports consisting of 284 incidents occurring during the reporting period and 35 older incidents, resolved 114 of those reports, while also resolving 256 previously reported cases, for a total of 370 resolved investigations. AARO states that every resolved case was attributed to ordinary explanations, including satellite flares identified through three-dimensional modeling. Notable findings include 50 notifications of unmanned aerial systems near U.S. nuclear infrastructure, though none were classified as UAP, and two reports involving electronic or avionic interference in operational aircraft whose attribution to UAP remains undetermined. The office received 262 submissions claiming first-hand knowledge of government UAP programs, of which seven individuals were identified for follow-up interviews.
Context
The FY2025 report shows a significant decrease from the previous year's 757 reports, largely because FY2024 included a substantial backlog of historical FAA submissions dating to 2021. The delayed release—occurring seven months after typical congressional reporting cycles—represents a departure from established practice, with the FY2024 report having been published in November 2024. AARO's expanded capability to identify satellite flares through advanced analysis addresses a category of reports that previously remained ambiguous. The increase in UAS notifications near nuclear facilities raises national security considerations, though AARO's determination that none qualify as UAP suggests conventional explanations. The office continues to reject claims that the U.S. government possesses recovered UAP material while simultaneously developing handling procedures for such material should it materialize.